The Elastic Future of Customer Experience

In a world where customer expectations evolve faster than business models can keep up, many organizations still treat Customer Experience (CX) as a secondary function, an afterthought behind sales, operations, or marketing. But the reality is clear: customer experience, when designed strategically, is not a cost center. It’s a growth engine.

This article distills over about two years of analysis into a unified view of how CX can become a dynamic lever for financial performance, organizational resilience, and competitive advantage. Anchored in a conceptual paper titled The Elastic Future of CX, I present four core concepts that together form a new management model: Experience Driven Growth Model (EDGM), CX Elasticity, the CX Elasticity Index (CXEI), and Ambidextrous CX.

This is more than a theoretical exercise. It’s a call to reframe CX as an operating system. One that balances performance and innovation, customer needs, financial impact, and organizational reinvention. Let’s start with the foundation: how CX creates value.

Experience Driven Growth Model
The Experience Driven Growth Model reimagines CX not as a linear journey, but as a regenerative system. At its core are CX Levers - experience design inputs such as expectation clarity, reliability, personalization, trust, and emotional resonance. These are the mechanisms organizations use to shape the customer journey.

When applied coherently, these levers generate measurable Business Outcomes. These include customer lifetime value (CLV), pipeline growth, operational efficiency, retention rate improvement, and advocacy. Each represents a financially relevant outcome that connects CX activity to bottom-line performance. The outermost layer of the Experience Driven Growth Model reflects Transformation Outcomes. These are deeper forms of value: a customer achieving mastery, reaching a health milestone, gaining a sense of identity alignment with a brand. It’s here that customers move beyond transaction into transformation. They don’t just buy a product, they change because of it.

This Experience Driven Growth Model framework draws inspiration from both the service-profit chain and the progression of economic value (Pine & Gilmore, 1999), moving from transactions to experience, and ultimately, to transformation. Each layer strengthens the next. The model becomes self-reinforcing - better CX drives business results, which fund deeper transformation, which produces more loyalty, trust, and growth.

To visualize the Experience Driven Growth Model, we use a garden metaphor. CX levers are the soil and roots. Business outcomes are the harvest. Transformation outcomes are pollination. Value that spreads beyond the initial investment. It’s organic, adaptive, and if well-managed, regenerative.

CX Levers in Action
Each lever builds on the previous one, forming a progression of cognitive and emotional responses in the customer that gradually leads to deeper loyalty, advocacy, and higher value contribution. These levers are drawn from a synthesis of service quality, relationship marketing, and CX behavior literature.

The CX Levers operate as a sequential yet cyclical progression of experience elements that collectively shape customer perception and behavior. The journey begins with clear expectations, followed by consistent delivery, which reduces effort and enables realized value. As customers gain a sense of control, they become more emotionally engaged, ultimately leading to trust reinforcement. Importantly, this trust does not mark the end of the process—it loops back to reinforce and elevate expectations for future interactions, thereby sustaining the Experience Driven Growth Model of experiential value creation.

These levers operate along a value continuum: from value-in-exchange (the price/perceived benefit tradeoff), to value-in-use (whether it works for me), to value-in-context (does it fit my situation), and value-in-transformation (who I become through this experience) (Holbrook, 1999; Vargo & Lusch, 2004).

Business and Transformation Outcomes
The measurable benefits of CX levers manifest first as operational and financial indicators: improved retention, lower cost-to-serve, higher revenue per customer, stronger lead quality. But as customers repeatedly experience trust, value, and meaning, they begin to identify with the brand. They self-categorize (“I’m someone who runs with this app,” or “I’m a loyal user of this software.”) This identity lock-in is powerful. It makes switching less likely, advocacy more natural, and competition less relevant.

Transformation outcomes go even further. They represent moments when a customer can say, “This brand helped me become who I want to be.” These are the moments that fuel evangelism, storytelling, and brand communities. Industries like healthcare, education, finance, SaaS, and personal development are especially ripe for transformation strategies. But even in B2B and retail, brands that understand identity transformation unlock a deeper layer of value.

CX Elasticity: The Missing Strategy Lens
If the Experience Driven Growth Model explains how CX drives value, CX Elasticity explains where and when those investments matter most. CX Elasticity refers to the responsiveness of business outcomes to changes in CX input. In the early stages of investment, most organizations experience high elasticity: small changes (like reducing friction, streamlining onboarding) yield big results (like conversion or retention lifts).

But elasticity is not infinite. Eventually, the system saturates. Further investments generate diminishing returns. And if the organization keeps stretching without adjusting tactics, it risks entering the fatigue zone where additional CX spend yields little or no value.

This dynamic can be modeled as a rubber band: In the elastic zone, small improvements drive outsized gains. In the strain-hardening zone, returns diminish. In the plastic zone, the system strains, deforms, or breaks. Understanding where the organization is on this curve is essential. Unfortunately, few CX leaders have a clear way to measure it. This creates the paradox: companies cut CX just when it matters most because they lack the data to defend it (Kahneman, 2011; Zeithaml, Bitner, & Gremler, 2020).

CXEI: Measuring Experience Impact with Precision
To operationalize CX Elasticity, I introduce the Customer Experience Elasticity Index (CXEI)—a formula designed to quantify the financial responsiveness of CX investments across five core levers:

Where:

Each variable reflects a core insight from marketing science, organizational behavior, and economics. The sigmoid function models diminishing returns, consistent with the experience curve theory (Rust, Lemon, & Zeithaml, 2004). Maturity and industry tuning account for variation in adoption readiness and sector responsiveness. The result is a structured method to identify where investment in CX will deliver the highest marginal impact.

This formula is not designed to replace existing KPIs, but to complement them. CXEI provides directional guidance for prioritizing initiatives, defending budgets, and managing CX portfolios across short- and long-term horizons.

Ambidextrous CX: The Capability to Sustain Growth and Innovation CX strategies often get stuck in a false choice: optimize or innovate? The answer is: both. Ambidextrous CX is the organizational capability to simultaneously pursue:

This dual-path capability is drawn from the broader literature on organizational ambidexterity (O’Reilly & Tushman, 2004; Gibson & Birkinshaw, 2004). It is essential when elasticity shifts, when known levers produce diminishing returns, exploration becomes a strategic necessity.

Ambidextrous CX helps firms reallocate attention and resources. Optimization efforts focus on delivering consistent experiences, lowering effort, and driving retention. Innovation efforts, meanwhile, explore new journeys, channels, or emotionally resonant moments.

To enable this, organizations must build contextual awareness, cultural readiness, and decision systems that support dual-track execution. CXEI plays a central role here, it enables elastic sensing, helping leaders know when to pivot.

The Garden Metaphor
CX, like a garden, must be cultivated. Some seasons require pruning. Others call for planting. The soil (CX levers) must be enriched. The harvest (business outcomes) must be gathered. And the transformation (pollination) must be nurtured. CXEI is the soil sensor and weather tracker. It tells you what’s fertile, what’s depleted, and when the climate is shifting. Ambidextrous CX is the gardener’s judgment: knowing when to maintain and when to redesign. It balances consistency with curiosity. This organic metaphor is more than aesthetic. It reminds us that CX is not mechanical. It’s human, seasonal, and relational. And like any great garden, it needs systems, data, vision and above all care.

Managerial Implications
CX is no longer a side project. It is a system that integrates:

Together, these components enable a new form of customer-led, performance-driven, transformation-ready growth. Organizations that adopt this framework will:

In a volatile, experience-driven economy, it’s not the best product or lowest price that wins. It’s the organizations that can stretch, adapt, and regenerate without snapping.

Download the conceptual paper titled The Elastic Future of CX on ResearchGate

References
Arussy, L. (2010). Customer experience strategy: The complete guide from innovation to execution. Strativity Group Press.
Dixon, M., Freeman, K., & Toman, N. (2010). Stop trying to delight your customers. Harvard Business Review, 88(7/8), 116–122.
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.
Grönroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36–44.
Holbrook, M. B. (1999). Consumer value: A framework for analysis and research. Routledge.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
McKinsey & Company. (2020). Next in personalization 2021. https://www.mckinsey.com
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74–81.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy: Work is theatre and every business a stage. Harvard Business Press.
Rust, R. T., Lemon, K. N., & Zeithaml, V. A. (2004). Return on marketing: Using customer equity to focus marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 109–127.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.
Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. D. (2020). Services marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm(8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.